|
|
California's
Energy Confusion: |
|||||
|
The
State’s energy crisis is surely the work of incompetent men. But maybe
it is not all incompetence. Historically, African Americans have had to
look beyond the facades and false syllogisms and see the truth of the
situations they have been placed into when White America has accepted
that situation as the norm. This type of thinking--outside the box-reasoning
that all others were accepting--has been a method Black people have used
to understand reality and to maintain their sanity. Maybe this type of critical thought is needed in this situation, where Californians are asked (told) to pay billions of dollars to bail out PG &E and Southern California Edison while those companies are concerned about dividends to their shareholders—a few well-to-do investors—and hide sums of money through diversionary accounting procedures. Maybe
this affair is not simply the incompetence of a cabal of standard White
elites on all of us this time. Maybe it is as African Americans
have had to see in the past, an almost automated system that attempts to
rationalize its shady actions through accounting shell games and other
dialectics that rationalize, even justify, the exhausting of the State’s
announced surplus and the reaching still further into the pockets of
Californians for more, simply because they know they have more. When
we look at the confusion that is the energy crisis, one thing is certain:
we, the public, are confused about what really is happening, and who
really is to be held accountable. From its initial smell, it seems
Republicans and big business are in a boat discussing ways to take our
money and give it to the businesses and the rich elite who manage those
businesses. But Sacramento has Gray Davis, who is quite gray indeed on
this deal. Surely, he is a part of the incompetence that surrounds
California’s energy fiasco. Yet,
an examination of the complexity of the California energy situation shows
the level of confusion that one is confronted with as he/she attempts to
wade through the issue. This confusion may be a designed confusion so that
the various companies who are now exhausting the State’s surplus and
reaching still further into the citizens’ pockets can do so without fear
of discovery of what they are really doing. Of
course, to many, this is nothing short of a conspiracy theorist’s
blueprint. However, I have never been viewed as a conspiracy theorist. But
for those who refuse to see a conspiracy regardless of how explicit
it is, you should stop
reading now. It
is difficult, if not impossible, to determine where the vital points of
control really are in this California energy nightmare. PG&E and
Southern
California Edison claim that they are near bankruptcy because of high
energy prices, and cannot pay their bills. Consequently, Californians have
been introduced to rolling blackouts as a new term in their lexicon
and a new situation in their lives. This, no doubt, is to punctuate the
energy companies’ point. It
should be kept in mind that while we try to discuss this confusion
rationally to show its confusion, Enron Energies, a Texas company,
has had stock prices soaring, along with their 89% profits this
quarter--another name to add to our glossary of terms. Just
last week, PG&E stated that there is no progress being made in their
negotiations with the State. And the State officials are demanding that
the negotiations and the costs the State is spending for energy be kept
secret—Nixon’s secret negotiations in Vietnam, anyone?
On the other hand, the State’s officials say that good progress
is being made in their negotiations with PG&E to bail out the energy
company. Instead of taking these companies over as a matter of the
public’s good—a simple process of Eminent
Domain, the State is
willing to bailout PG&E and Southern California Edison so that they can
make regular dividend payments to their shareholders and raise the utility
rates on a regular basis. PG&E wants a State bailout of $7 billion
and an increase in the rates by 45%. But when PG&E is confronted with this
energy shortage, as to why and how it has occurred, they refer to others
as the real culprits. PG&E
and Southern California Edison will raise the names of Independent Energy
Qualifiers when pushed into a corner. So we add more new terms to our glossary. Then the Western Power Trading Forum, an energy association,
weighed in and stated that at least a 30% rate increase for the next
decade is the base minimum that is needed for California’s energy. Aside
from this new name we must add to our glossary of terms, this group is asking to
lock in at least a 30% rate increase for the next ten years. This is in
the face of the power generators having overcharged Californians
by $6.2
billion, as alleged by the California Independent Systems Operators (ISO)—two
additional new terms. And, of course, there is
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, whatever they do. The
Power Generators have said that a number of in-state power suppliers and
some out-of-state suppliers have overcharged them for their electricity, and
that is the reason they have charged us as they have—they are just
passing their costs on to the public. With
all of these terms and accusations, it is difficult for the average John Q.
Public—and it is that person who pays the utility companies, whomever
those companies may be, and the State—to figure out who generates the
electricity that comes into our homes, who regulates its so that we do not
have our pockets picked, as we seem to be having in a grand fashion now;
it is also confusing to know what PG &E and Southern California Edison do,
since they both disclaim any blame, responsibility, or control for the mess
we are in. Who are these anonymous systems operators? What is the role of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Public Utility Commission
in California? Who are these Independent Power Suppliers? Is someone
over-looked in this panoply of actors? The
fact is that all of this seems to be a shell game where there in no coin
under any of the shells—except, that is, in the public’s shell, and we
are not even in the game. By Gibbs Staff 3/12/02 |
||||||