By Sifelani Tsiko
Harare, Zimbabwe
(March 30 2007)
EVENTS to mark the
200-year anniversary
of the day the
British parliament
passed a law banning
the trade of human
beings were held
around the world
with reparations
activists bemoaning
the lack of an
explicit apology
from the former
slave-trading
nations.
There was no
commitment by
British prime
minister Tony Blair
and churches which
profited from this
inhuman and cruel
trade to specific
reparations aimed at
compensating those
who suffered from
the trade.
A commemorative
service was held at
Westminster Abbey to
mark the 200th
anniversary of the
abolition of the
slave trade act.
The Queen and Duke
of Edinburgh, Blair
and religious
leaders were among 2
000 people who
attended the
service.
The Archbishop of
Canterbury, Rowan
Williams, described
slavery as an
offence to human
dignity and freedom
and "the greatest
cause of grief to
God's spirit".
His church profited
immensely from this
cruel trade in
humans.
"We, who are the
heirs of the
slave-owning and
slave-trading
nations of the past,
have to face the
fact that our
historic prosperity
was built in large
part on this
atrocity," he said.
"Those who are the
heirs of the
communities ravaged
by the slave trade
know very well that
much of their
present suffering
and struggling is
the result of
centuries of abuse."
No official apology
was made by the
Queen, Blair and
Church of England
clergy.
Instead, the
commemorative
service was at best
held to glorify
William Wilberfoce
who was a prime
mover of the
abolition of slave
trade motion which
led to an enactment
on March 25, 1807.
The Slave Trade Act
of March 1807 never
stopped slavery but
prohibited British
ships from
transporting slaves.
African scholars say
Wilberforce was not
the only person who
helped end slavery.
It is worth noting
that Britain did not
abolish slavery in
its territories
until 1833.
Blacks like Olaudah
Equiano, a former
slave, thousand
others who signed
petitions, marched,
lobbied against this
transatlantic slave
trade were critical
in the anti-slave
trade movement.
It was sad that the
role of these people
was downplayed and
restricted to the
fringes of this
movement at the
commemorative
service.
For the better part
of the
commemorations,
Blair and the Queen
only seized the
event to glorify one
of their own.
They laid flowers
on the memorial to
William Wilberforce,
who Europeans in
their history text
books say led the
abolition movement,
and then, of course
to the lesser
Innocent Victims'
Memorial, in honour
of all those
affected by slavery.
Lady (Kate) Davson,
the
great-great-great
grand-daughter of
William Wilberforce
was also used
strengthen the
belief that the
British cared and
saved black people
from this evil human
trade system.
She read a speech
made by her ancestor
to the House of
Commons.
Africans at home and
abroad wanted Blair
and the Queen to go
a step further –make
an official apology.
Linda Ali, of the
United Society for
the Propagation of
the Gospel said
Blair who had
expressed "deep
sorrow and regret"
at Britain's role in
the slave trade must
go a step further.
"I don't see what is
so very difficult
about apologising
for what is such a
great crime against
humanity," said Ms
Ali.
Even Lady Davson
said she too thought
Mr Blair should
apologise.
"Slavery is one of
the largest pieces
of our wounded
history, our
worldwide wounded
history, and...[has]
to be confronted in
order to get peace
in our world."
The British prime
minister did not
speak at the
service.
"It is hard to
believe that what
would now be a crime
against humanity was
legal at the time,"
Blair said in an
opinion piece on
Britain's role in
the transantlatic
slave trade before
the commemorations.
"Personally I
believe the
bicentenary offers
us a chance not just
to say how
profoundly shameful
the slave trade was
–how we condemn its
existence utterly
and praise those who
fought for its
abolition – but also
to express our deep
sorrow that it ever
happened, that it
ever could have
happened and to
rejoice at the
different and better
times we live in
today," Mr Blair
said.
Even though Mr Blair
admitted that
Britain is richer in
every way –in
business, politics,
sport, the arts and
science because of
the part played by
the African and
Caribbean
communities, he
remained adamant and
never apologised.
Instead, he used the
colourful language
of racial equality
and 'the richness of
our diversity'
approach to
tactically avoid the
crucial apology
which Africans at
home and abroad so
wanted.
But the African
spirit remained
unbowed despite the
refusal by Mr Blair
to make an official
apology.
According to media
reports, people
across the Caribbean
bowed their heads
for a moment of
silence to mark the
end of the
trans-Atlantic slave
routes, which shaped
the region's
history.
In Jamaica,
islanders held
symbolic funeral
rites in Kingston
Harbour for African
slaves who died
during the perilous
ocean crossing.
In the Dominica, the
cries of African
slaves being led to
cell blocks pierced
the air as their
lives were
re-enacted.
Participants walked
in chains to
Roseau's Baraccoon
building, where
slaves were held
before being
auctioned off to
plantation owners in
the former French
and British colony,
and which now houses
the City Council.
Media reports in
Guyana say a tribute
was held in the
compound of
parliament buildings
where slaves were
beaten and sometimes
hanged.
"We unite as a
region and as a
people, in a
collective moment of
reflection, as we
remember one of the
greatest tragedies
in the history of
humanity, which
denied over 25
million Africans,
for over 400 years,
the basic human
right of freedom,
the right to self
actualization and
for so many, denial
of even their basic
right to life," said
Ralph Gonsalves,
prime minister of
St. Vincent and the
Grenadines and
chairman of the
Caribbean Community.
Dr John Sentamu, the
second most senior
cleric in the Church
of England told the
media that Britain
was a country which
once bought and sold
slaves "as it did
crops like onions or
maize," and now had
to make a formal
apology.
"A nation of this
quality should have
the sense of saying
we are very sorry
and we have to put
the record
straight," he said.
At the anti-racism
conference that was
held three years ago
in Durban, South
Africa, participants
agreed that the
depredation of the
systems of slavery
and colonialism had
a degrading and
debilitating impact
on those who are
black.
The African
delegations in
Durban noted with
concern the lack of
an explicit apology
from the former
slave-trading
nations or any
commitment to
specific reparations
aimed at
compensating those
who suffered from
the trade.
However, despite the
criticism, the
debates in Durban
broke new ground in
the decade-long
campaign by African
countries and
representatives of
the African Diaspora
to gain
international
recognition for the
injustices
perpetrated against
them in the era of
the slave trade.
The issue was not
just one of righting
an historical wrong,
they argued, but
also of addressing
the lasting legacy
of poverty and
discrimination
suffered over
centuries by Africa
and its descendants.
In the early 1990s,
the Organization of
African Unity (OAU)
now the African
Union, officially
embraced the idea of
making claims for
atonement, including
specific
reparations, for
slavery and
colonialism.
While there was
general agreement on
having the slave
trade declared a
crime against
humanity, not
everyone felt that
an explicit apology
or financial
reparations were
worth pursuing at
the conference.
Others felt
demanding money
trivialised the
impact of slavery.
Not "every apology
must be followed by
monetary
compensation.... We
must not forget that
monetary
compensation, as it
is being proposed,
may further hurt the
dignity of Africa,"
Nigerian President
Olusegun Obasanjo
said in the build up
to Durban
conference.
In this renewed
debate on slavery
Africans must remain
conscious of the
historical
injustices of the
slave trade which
critics say
undeniably
contributed to
poverty,
underdevelopment,
marginalization,
social exclusion,
economic
disparities,
instability and
insecurity on the
continent.
They must also
begrudgingly accept
that even though
Britain and other
countries that
benefited from
slavery have refused
make official
apologies, the most
important thing is
to ensure that this
shameful and
uncomfortable
chapter of history
is not forgotten.
Africans need a
genuine apology not
for monetary gain,
but to help restore
the dignity and
humanity of those
who suffered and
still bear the scars
of slavery.
Give Us Your
Feedback