![]() Gary N. Gray |
The Casey Martin Decision:
What it Means for Disabled Players |
|||||
|
I would like to see these two Justices disabled for a day or maybe even a week. Maybe then they could see the life of challenges faced by disabled Americans. Then, maybe, they would change their minds. Golf tournaments are public accommodations and are covered by the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); letting Casey Martin use a cart is a reasonable modification that gives him the access required by law. The Washington Post stated that insight in their May 30, issue. This could be the landmark court decision most disabled athletes have been looking for. Time and time again disabled athletes have had to conform to their non-disabled sports partners. Playing, if you will, with a double handicap. In this decision, the Supreme Court allowed Martin the use of a golf cart while playing the game he so loves. The Court also narrowed the decision only to the Casey Martin case and nobody else. Thus, the Professional Golf Association can still bar individuals from taking the cart on the golf course, but I think they will not be so aggressive the next time. Many other professional organizations will also evaluate the situation before barring any other disabled person from their sport. Martin was born with a disability that slowly takes away the use of muscles in a leg, an arm, or a foot. This process will proceed until the limb is rendered useless. So in my opinion, every day Casey Martin takes to the greens is a day of joy and wonderment, playing with all the other golf professionals. With this current court decision and the feedback this week, the Professional Golf Association has shown its true colors. This organization has no class and wants to stick by its ancient rules, no matter what the case is. All of the legal actions caused one of most embarrassing public relations disasters in sports history. If the world followed the PGA letter of the law rules, disabled people in this country would all be in serious trouble. The PGA should be ashamed of itself because there are so few disabled pro athletes in this world. Actually, you can count them all on one hand. Aaron Jones of the Atlanta Braves is deaf and this team has won the world championship of baseball. This man cannot hear, but he can hit a baseball and field his position as well as any other baseball player. He just has to pay attention to the game a lot more than other players in the league. His eyes serve double duty and he must be alert the whole game. Tom Dempsey of the New Orleans Saints had a club foot. Dempsey was the field goal kicker for the New Orleans Saints. People all over the country and fellow players said it was an unfair advantage. Dempsey had a square toe shoe on his kicking foot. He broke the national football league record for the longest field goal--a long 63 yards at the end of the game to defeat the Detroit Lions. I was in high school then and I kept thinking this was the coolest thing I've ever seen. It was a victory for the Saints and a very happy Tom Dempsey, smiling ear to ear. I felt good seeing a fellow disabled person perform well at any professional sport. We should be ashamed that the Martin case had to be taken to court by a man who just loves the game and wants to play the game of golf. Common sense should have ruled the day but it didn't. Sports should be for everyone and if somebody can play the professional game well they should be allowed to play. If a disabled athlete puts in the time, endures the stress, and shows the dedication he or she should be rewarded just like able-bodied athlete. This athlete should be on the court, on the field, on the bowling alley, or in the swimming pool, wherever the sport is played. I, too, have had an experience with professional sports being afraid of the unknown. The American Bowling Congress wanted me to stop bowling in sanctioned leagues. There are certain rules in their books that state that it is illegal to move the bowling ball with a mechanical object, and my motorized wheelchair is considered a mechanical object; thus that created a large problem. Many leagues did not want me to bowl. I had to find a disabled friendly league, and, even then, some of the others in the league did not like it. Finally, I had a meeting with three ABC representatives about disabled bowlers who could not bowl in leagues throughout the land because of this law. My friend and I had to show them that it really was not an advantage to bowl in a motorized chair. We got ABC to amend the rules just like the Supreme Court has modified the PGA laws on disabled issues. So just like The Civil Rights Laws of the 60's it will take more time and more understanding. So thank you, Casey Martin, for fighting the fight and hanging tough against the Professional Golf Association. I respect you, even if you don't win a single title; you are king of golf in my book. Tiger, move over; Casey Martin is here. [] Commentary by Gary N. Gray |
||||||